Blog

The Committee also recalled that the twenty-fourth session of the Bureau (June 2000) had requested that there be further examination of the possibility of a sub-committee system and that the Special Session of the Bureau (Budapest, 2-4 October 2000) had discussed the proposal further with reference to a paper prepared by the United Kingdom. The Inscription Process . Reporting & Monitoring State of Conservation (SOC) Periodic Reporting Questionnaires 2008-2015 Reactive Monitoring Africa Arab States Asia & Pacific Latin America and the Caribbean Europe and North America. With your help, several Ohio landmarks could be ranked alongside Stonehenge in England, the Acropolis in Athens and the Grand Canyon. The Director of the World Heritage Centre noted that additional human and financial resources would be required for the Centre to co-ordinate this process. Recognising the need to increase the technical and administrative capacity of the World Heritage systems, to encourage growth of under-represented categories and geographical coverage, and acknowledge the work constraints of the Committee, the Advisory Bodies, World Heritage Centre and States Parties to achieve this objective. There was strong general sentiment among the Committee members that the architecture of Fran… XVII.8 The Delegate of Italy agreed to the strict application of the Operational Guidelines, however, underlined that the Guidelines had been followed and that the Committee itself is the decision-making body of the World Heritage statutory organs. The Committee requested that the Operational Guidelines be simplified, streamlined and presented in a user-friendly form with most of the existing and new supporting material to be moved to annexes and other documentation. The deadline for receipt of international assistance requests and state of conservation reports would also be on 1 February. World Heritage Site. The document refers to the need to address the balance of representation of the World Heritage List in favour of under- represented or non-represented countries. Large-scale requests (that is those exceeding US$ 30,000) will be forwarded, with the Bureau's recommendation, to the following session of the World Heritage Committee for decision-making.". . of the Operational Guidelines on the format and content of nominations and replaced paragraph 64 of the Operational Guidelines by the following text: "64. Such proposals could include the creation of inter-institutional and inter-sectoral site commissions and the networking of properties in order to ensure their adequate monitoring, management, including traditional management mechanisms, involvement of local populations and sustainable conservation. The order of priority for the examination of the nominations for inscription, The state of preparation of the beneficiary countries, and. Maps and/or plans showing boundary of area proposed for inscription and of any buffer zonef. The Committee noted that the Hungarian authorities had prepared a proposal for the establishment of a Heritage Partnership Programme to be examined by the Committee at its twenty-fourth session in Cairns (WHC-2000/CONF.204/19). Noting with interest the results of the ICOMOS and IUCN analyses, as well as additional analyses undertaken by the World Heritage Centre as presented in document WHC-04/28.COM/13. It's an impressive list of 2018 nominees for UNESCO World Heritage Sites. The World Heritage Committee selects the sites to be listed as UNESCO World Heritage Sites, including the World Heritage List and the List of World Heritage in Danger. United Nations. Statement of significanceb. The Committee requested the Secretariat to inform all States Parties of the implementation of the new electoral procedures, particularly those States Parties which may fulfill the conditions to be candidates for the reserved seat. Agency/agencies with management authoritye. Kai Weise. Evaluations would be due from IUCN and/or ICOMOS 6 weeks prior to the April Bureau. Development Pressures (e.g., encroachment, adaptation, agriculture, mining)b. Ambassador J. Musitelli (France). XVII.5 The Committee recalled several discussions held on the application of cultural criterion (vi) and decided to amend paragraph 24 (a) (vi) as follows: "be directly or tangibly associated with events or living traditions, with ideas, or with beliefs, with artistic and literary works of outstanding universal significance (the Committee considers that this criterion should justify inclusion in the List only in exceptional circumstances and in conjunction with other criteria cultural or natural);". UNESCO World Heritage. It can also defer its decision and request further information on sites from the States Parties. Full and complete nominations received by the World Heritage Centre prior to 31 December 2000 will be considered together with nominations deferred, or referred, from previous meetings and changes to the boundaries of already inscribed properties. Possible comparative analysis (including state of conservation of similar sites)c. Authenticity/Integrityd. c) to implement regional, and, as appropriate, sub-regional programmes based on results of Periodic Reporting to increase the State Parties' capacity for the identification, nomination, and conservation of World Heritage properties. Nominations to be submitted by 1 February 2002 and prioritized in accordance with the system as described above. As requested by the Special Session of the Bureau, a paper on the feasibility and implications of a sub-committee system was prepared and examined by the twenty-fourth extraordinary session of the Bureau (WHC-2000/CONF.203/6). The ordering of the agenda by topics was considered useful as was the use of informal ad hoc working groups to expedite the work of the Bureau and Committee. The Committee noted the proposals on the equitable representation of the Committee developed following the Special Session of the Bureau session (WHC-2000/CONF.204/6) and decided to recommend the following Draft Resolution for adoption by the 13th General Assembly: The General Assembly of States Parties to the Convention concerning the protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. (iii) Every State Party to this Convention shall, in so far as possible, submit to the World Heritage Committee an inventory of property forming part of the cultural and natural heritage, situated in its territory and suitable for inclusion in the list . In the first instance and on an interim basis, it is proposed that at the twenty-seventh session of the Committee in 2003, the number of nominations examined by the Committee will be limited to a maximum of 30 new sites. The same form approved by the Committee is used for the submission of nominations of cultural and natural properties. Nominations for the World Heritage List are only accepted if the site was previously listed on the tentative list. Map. Considers that capacity-building should be strategic, comprehensive, and institutionalised, and that it should focus, in particular on the identification of potential properties, preparation of representative Tentative Lists, preparation of nominations, conservation action and management of properties; a) States Parties, the World Heritage Centre and other partners to significantly increase their support to States Parties, in particular those less represented in the List, in the identification of cultural, natural and mixed properties of potential outstanding universal value, as well as in the preparation of nomination dossiers ; b) the Advisory Bodies (ICOMOS, ICCROM, IUCN) to increase their support to States Parties, in particular those less represented in the List, in the identification of cultural, natural and mixed properties of potential outstanding universal value; 12. (ii) The advisory bodies and the World Heritage Centre should use the opportunity of evaluation missions to hold regional training workshops to assist under-represented States in the methods of preparation of their tentative list and nominations. VI.2 In view of the large number of detailed recommendations prepared by the four groups listed above, and given that there was limited time for discussion, the Committee focused its discussions on the reform process by examining four specific issues as follows: 1. The Committee agreed to the following phased approach to the revision of the Operational Guidelines. Following a report on the results of the Expert Meeting by Christopher Young (United Kingdom), who had chaired the meeting, the Committee decided that the Operational Guidelines be restructured according to the proposed new overall framework (WHC-2000/CONF.204/INF.10). ", 3. b) to encourage the increased participation of local authorities, civil society organizations and populations in the identification of the cultural and natural heritage of States Parties. The Committee, composed of representatives of 21 nations periodically elected as the governing body of the World Heritage Convention, makes the final decisions on which nominations to accept on the World Heritage List at its annual meeting each summer. IUCN welcomed the excellent work done at the Canterbury Expert Meeting to propose a reshaping of the Operational Guidelines. For the third and fourth ballots, the voting shall be restricted to the States obtaining the greatest number of votes in the previous ballot, up to a number twice that of the seats remaining to be filled. 8. The analysis will provide States Parties with a clear overview of the present situation, and likely trends in the short to medium term with a view to identifying under-represented categories. To ensure the credibility of the World Heritage List, it assesses the global significance, management, and integrity of the nominated sites. For this reason, the work should be undertaken in two parts, sites inscribed on the World Heritage List and sites on the tentative list. The report of the Working Group was discussed at the June and October 2000 sessions of the Bureau (WHC-2000/CONF.204/INF.9). Deadline: 31 July 2020. The Committee examined and discussed the recommendations of the Working Group on the Representivity of the World Heritage List chaired by Ambassador Yai (Benin), which had been transmitted by the Special Session of the Bureau with some changes. b) the extent to which the nominations presented at its 30th session (2006) contribute to the aim of a representative World Heritage List. Copies of site management plans and extracts of other plans relevant to the sitec. Further requests the World Heritage Centre to report on the proposals and conclusions of the special meeting of experts of all regions referred to in paragraph 13, for consideration by the Committee at its 29th session (2005); 16. Maps. The Committee reaffirmed the Convention for the Protection of the World Natural and Cultural Heritage as an instrument of consensus, cooperation and accord between States Parties and takes particular note of Articles 6 (1) and 6 (2) and Article 11 (1): (ii) The States Parties undertake, in accordance with the provisions of this Convention, to give their help in the identification, protection, conservation and presentation of the cultural and natural heritage . XVII.7 The Delegates of Germany and the United States of America made statements as to the legal significance of the Operational Guidelines and the fact that, in their views, the Operational Guidelines had not been applied properly during this session. It was agreed that revised Operational Guidelines should reflect different regional and cultural perspectives. The Committee decided to call on States Parties concerned to inform the Committee with a minimum of delay, of measures taken in the implementation of the clauses of the Resolution adopted by the Twelfth General Assembly (Paragraph B) that invites all States Parties that already have a substantial number of sites inscribed on the World Heritage List to: (i) Apply paragraph 6 (vii) of the Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention: ii) Initiate and encourage bilateral and multilateral co-operation with States Parties whose heritage is still under-represented in the List within the framework of the preparation of tentative lists, nominations and training programmes. Spread the Love !The Govt. In order to underline their incentive nature, the Plans of Action should highlight the actions by the States Parties concerned, notably in application of Article 5 of the Convention, and should mention the bilateral or multilateral co-operation programmes in the field of heritage in general, for the elaboration in particular of nominations. Because UNESCO asks countries to wait a year before submitting nominations from their tentative lists, the first time that any U.S. World Heritage nominations drawn from the new List could go forward would be at the beginning of 2009 with consideration by the World Heritage Committee likely in the summer of … The Committee also decided to revise the Rules of Procedure of the World Heritage Committee as follows: "In determining the place of the next session, the Committee shall give due regard to the need to ensure an equitable rotation among the different regions and cultures of the world. if any, a. It’s official—the 2019 nominees for UNESCO’s World Heritage List of protected sites have been assembled, and an 11-day deliberation period in Baku, Azerbaijan, begins this week. Facilitate the work of the World Heritage Committee and allow it to devote more time to general policy discussions for the implementation of the Convention, Improve the prior examination of various issues submitted to the Committee, and. Nepal’s World Heritage nominations. Name of Propertyd. Follow and join our discussions for 2020 in the Forum. Both were submitted in 2014. At its meeting in Istanbul, Turkey, in July 2016, the World Heritage Committee (WHC) decided to “refer” the nomination. The IUCN World Heritage Panel met last week to evaluate site nominations proposed for the UNESCO World Heritage List in 2019. XVII.9 In concluding the debate which she found constructive, the Chairperson recalled that each one of the delegates of the Committee had made a serious analysis of the case and of the spirit of the Convention before taking a final decision, and that in respecting the statements of each of the speakers, even if she considered not acceptable those of the Delegates of Germany and the United States of America, the Committee had retained its credibility and competence. Publications World Heritage Review Series Resource Manuals World Heritage wall map More publications ... Funding World Heritage Fund International Assistance. Emphasizing that Tentative Lists are an effective and indispensable tool in the identification of potential World Heritage properties at national and (sub)regional level, and thereby contributing to the representativity of the World Heritage List. The Committee decided that cooperative efforts in capacity-building and training are necessary to ensure that the World Heritage List is fully representative and agrees that: (i) The World Heritage Centre should continue to promote training programmes, preferably at the regional level, aimed at allowing States Parties whose heritage is still under-represented to be better versed in the Convention and to better implement the measures under Article 5. 5. The Committee requested the Secretariat to prepare with the involvement of interested States Parties and the advisory bodies, a proposal for the twenty-sixth session of the World Heritage Committee for further amendment to Rule 13 of the Rules of Procedures of the General Assembly relating to the election of members of the World Heritage Committee in order to ensure an equitable representation of the different regions and cultures of the world. He also thanked the Government of the United Kingdom for having offered to provide an additional financial contribution to this important activity in 2001. EXAMINATION OF NOMINATIONS OF NATURAL, MIXED AND CULTURAL SITES TO THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST Summary At its 42nd session, the Committee will be examining a total of 31 nominations. XVII.2 The Delegate of Canada proposed to keep the Vanoise recommendations as well as comments by States Parties on record and bring them up at the joint meeting of cultural and natural heritage experts proposed under agenda item 9 "Progress report on the Global Strategy, and Thematic and Comparative Studies". The Delegate of France agreed to this statement and said that it is common practice of the Committee not always to follow recommendations by the Bureau and by the advisory bodies. Number of inhabitants within site, buffer zonef. Login Sign up. During the transition period the following timetable would apply: The Committee decided to defer a decision on the introduction of a sub-committee system or the extension of the Bureau session from six to eight days, until the effectiveness of the other reforms (changed statutory meeting calendar and cycle, limitation in number of nominations to be examined each year and reforms to meeting documentation) could be assessed at a later date. 13.8 Those States obtaining in the first ballot the required majority shall be elected, unless the number of States obtaining that majority is greater than the number of seats to be filled. World heritage nominations are assessed by UNESCO regional office. if the States on whose territory it is situated so request (Article 6 (2)). by deciding, on a voluntary basis, to suspend the presentation of new nominations. Dear members of ICOMOS, As you know, the work of ICOMOS as an Advisory Body to the World Heritage Committee requires the evaluation each year of the nominations submitted by the States Parties for all cultural and mixed properties aiming to be inscribed on the World Heritage List.. The Committee agreed to transmit its decision to the Thirteenth General Assembly of States Parties in 2001. As of 2019, Iceland has six on its tentative list. Tentative. Unsuccessful candidates in the reserved ballot would be eligible to stand in the open ballot. Referrals of nominations would be re-examined by the Bureau in the year following initial examination before proceeding to the Committee for decision. The ICOMOS procedure is described in Annex 6 of the Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. In order to determine which sites should be given priority for consideration, all nominations to be considered at the twenty- seventh session of the Committee must be received in full by the new due date of 1 February 2002 agreed by the Committee as part of the change of cycle of meetings. This analysis should be undertaken as soon as possible, taking into account the workload on advisory bodies and the financial implications of this work, particularly in regard to the large number of sites on the tentative list. The criteria are regularly revised by the Committee to reflect the evolution of the World Heritage concept itself. If the number of States obtaining the majority required is still less than the number of seats to be filled there shall be a third and, if necessary a fourth ballot, to fill the remaining seats. Desk assessment exercise by UNESCO staff, if successful, followed by: On-site assessment by an ICOMOS expert team ; Are world heritage criteria met? Policies and programmes related to the presentation and promotion of the property, a. Ownershipb. The Committee noted that more effective use of tentative lists and greater regulation of the ever-increasing number of nominations was required. Facilitate the work of the World Heritage Centre. The system described above is to be reviewed by the Committee after two full years of operation. Increase representation of States Parties in the work of the Committee. Tentative list. The statement of the Chairperson is also included in Annex IX. By preparing a Tentative List and selecting sites from it, a State Party can plan when to present a nomination file. 2 In nominating properties to the List, States Parties are invited to keep in mind the desirability of achieving a reasonable balance between the numbers of cultural heritage and natural heritage properties included in the World Heritage List (Paragraph 15 of the Operational Guidelines). It is a list of candidate sites which a country intends to consider for nomination within a given time period. Once a site has been nominated and evaluated, it is up to the intergovernmental World Heritage Committee to make the final decision on its inscription. This deferral would imply only a limited pause (7 months) in the nomination process, and allow the necessary transitional adjustments, Introduce a biennial budget for the World Heritage Fund to harmonize with the UNESCO budget cycle, Review any changes to the calendar, cycle and meetings of the Bureau (or sub-committees) and the Committee after they have been in operation for 4 years, facilitate decision-making and increase efficiency, provide transparency and equity of access to documentation, reducing the number of working documents by compiling one decision-making guide to be distributed 2 weeks prior to the meeting, including additional working documents only in exceptional cases - e.g. In order to address the issue of representivity of the List the following criteria will be applied in order of priority:2. More Contacts Site Map Become a member Donate Now! Recalling Article 9 of the Convention which stipulates that "The term of office of States members of the World Heritage Committee shall extend from the end of the ordinary session of the General Conference during which they are elected until the end of its third subsequent ordinary session"; Recalling the Resolution of the 7th General Assembly of States Parties (1989); Considering the representivity of the World Heritage List could be enhanced through the increased participation in the work of the Committee of States Parties whose heritage is currently unrepresented in the List; Considering that the strong interest of States Parties in participating in the work of the World Heritage Committee could be addressed by a more frequent rotation of Committee members; Invites the States Parties to the World Heritage Convention, to voluntarily reduce their term of office from six to four years; Encourages States Parties that are not members of the Committee to make use of their right to participate in meetings of the World Heritage Committee as observers; Discourages States Parties from seeking consecutive terms of office in the World Heritage Committee; Decides that before each election of Committee members, the President of the General Assembly of States Parties will inform States Parties of the situation of the representation of regions and cultures in the World Heritage Committee and World Heritage List; Decides to amend its Rules of Procedure as follows: A certain number of seats may be reserved for State Parties who do not have sites on the World Heritage List, upon decision of the World Heritage Committee at the session that precedes the General Assembly. Post-Conflict and Post-Disaster Responses, Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, Retrospective Inventory and "boundary clarifications", 28COM 13.1 Global Strategy for a representative, balanced and credible World heritage List, 06EXTCOM 5.4 New numbering system for the combined criteria (i) to (x), 24COM VI Cairns Decisions - Work of The World Heritage Reform Groups, 20COM XVII.1-9 Revision of the Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, Online Training supports African countries to develop nomination dossiers, Ethiopia receives support in preparation of World Heritage nomination files, Two natural sites, one in China, another in Iran, inscribed on UNESCO’s World Heritage List, UNESCO, Africa and China agree on projects to safeguard World Heritage in Africa, Polish city of Kraków to host 2017 World Heritage Committee session, Call for application: TABE’A Programme Training Series: Tentative Lists and Nomination preparation for Natural World Heritage sites, Expert meeting on Improvement to “upstream processes" prior to consideration of nominations by the World Heritage Committee, International expert meeting on World Heritage and serial properties and nominations, International Expert meeting on World Heritage and buffer zones, Astronomy and World Heritage Thematic Initiative, Human Evolution: Adaptations, Dispersals and Social Developments (HEADS), Initiative on Heritage of Astronomy, Science and Technology, Initiative on Heritage of Religious Interest, Natural World Heritage in the Congo Basin, Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape, Reducing Disasters Risks at World Heritage Properties, World Heritage and Sustainable Development, World Heritage and Sustainable Tourism Programme, World Heritage Centre’s Natural Heritage Strategy, World Heritage Earthen Architecture Programme (WHEAP). Country (and State Party if different)b. Yai (Benin)Rapporteur: H.E. Deadline: The original signed version of the completed Factual Errors submission form should be received in English or French by the UNESCO World Heritage Centre, no later than 14 days before the opening of the session of the Committee. This proposal is to be based on a thorough analysis of the consequences of the proposed changes and the adjustments that would be required to the election procedures. From the 2002-2003 biennium, an intersectoral project should be developed and implemented to encourage the States Parties whose heritage is still under- represented to reinforce their capacity to protect, conserve and enhance it. In order to implement the new rule to be inserted following Rule 13.1, the Committee decided that one seat be reserved for a State Party not having a site inscribed on the World Heritage List at the date of the thirteenth session of the General Assembly. Bibliographyd. 1Full and complete nominations received by the World Heritage Centre prior to 31 December 2000 will be considered together with nominations deferred, or referred, from previous meetings and changes to the boundaries of already inscribed properties. No State Parties should submit more than one nomination, except those States Parties that have no sites inscribed on the World Heritage List who will have the opportunity to propose two or three nominations. Description of Propertyb. (yes/no/needs more work) A successful outcome leads to submission to the World Heritage Committee. June 25, 2019 Express Informer. State, Province or Regionc. (iii) Requests by States Parties whose heritage is non- represented or under-represented should be given a high priority when the portion of the World Heritage budget relating to Preparatory Assistance in preparing nominations is developed. The revised Operational Guidelines will introduce for the first time a consolidated section on the Protection and Conservation of World Heritage Properties. Since 2012, Quang Ninh province has compiled dossiers to nominate Yen Tu as the World Heritage Nominations. IUCN expressed their wish to contribute to a process of revisions and proposed five objectives for the revised Operational Guidelines: The Committee decided that the process for revising the Operational Guidelines should be co-ordinated by the World Heritage Centre through a collaborative process involving representatives of States Parties, the advisory bodies and the Secretariat. Decides that this resolution should be implemented immediately. If the number of States obtaining the majority required is less than the number of seats to be filled, there shall be a second ballot, followed by a third and, if necessary a fourth, to fill the remaining seats. Recently, the Minister of State of Culture and Tourism has informed Lok Sabha that India has submitted two nomination dossiers namely ‘Dholavira: A Harappan City’ and ‘Monuments and Forts of Deccan Sultanate’ for inclusion in the World Heritage List for the year 2020.; Dholavira: A Harappan City Legal statusc. all other documents as Information Documents. Such programmes should also assist States Parties to acquire and/or consolidate their expertise, in the preparation and harmonisation of their tentative lists and the preparation of nominations. The World Heritage Convention This 1972 Treaty established the World Heritage List and the World Heritage Committee, which makes final decisions on all World Heritage nominations. A nominated property is independently evaluated by two Advisory Bodies mandated by the World Heritage Convention: the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) and the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), which respectively provide the World Heritage Committee with evaluations of the cultural and natural sites nominated. Beyond the conditions provided for by the Convention, and subject to the conclusions of the evaluation of international assistance, the new priority order should take into account: (v) Regional Plans of Action should be updated and developed within the framework of the Global Strategy. Both Dholavira and the Deccan Sultanate forts and monuments are included in India’s Tentative List. In that case, the States obtaining the greatest number of votes, up to the number of seats to be filled, shall be declared elected.

Borja Valero Capelli, Film Dei Carabinieri, Gimenez Numero Maglia, Festa San Giuseppe Da Copertino 2020, Daikin 2mxs40fv1b Scheda Tecnica, Lo Strano Percorso Accordi, Assistente Educatore Requisiti, Mondiali 2018 Italia,